Next: Visualizing characteristic structures
Up: Summary
Previous: Poincaré maps and visualization
Besides the direct visualization of dynamical systems the
visualization after analysis is an important field of research.
Often the topology of a dynamical system is extracted in advance,
and visualization is used afterwards to communicate the results.
Usually the following procedure is used: First, the critical
points are identified. Next, the Jacobian matrix is investigated
for all critical points to classify their type (attractor,
repellor, etc.), and to extract the characteristic trajectories
emanating from these points. Further investigation is used to
clarify the interrelation between the critical points. Then,
critical elements of higher order, e.g., cycles or tori, are
searched. Again local derivatives are investigated to identify
the type of these higher order critical elements.
The identification of critical points as the most important step
of flow topology analysis raises a demand on sophisticated
visualization techniques to convey the results of the analysis.
Location, type, as well as the local properties derived from the
Jacobian matrix can be visualized. Depending on the type of
the critical point different methods are useful:
Three characteristic trajectories -
- if all eigenvalues of the Jacobian matrix are real, different from
each other, and different from zero, three characteristic
trajectories are connected to the critical point. If all of
the eigenvalues are negative (positive), the critical point
is an attracting (repelling) node. Mixed signs indicate
real saddles.
An intuitive visualization is to (numerically) integrate the
characteristic trajectories and indicate the order of
attraction/repulsion by the number of arrow glyphs
positioned onto them. As an example
Fig. 6.1(a) shows the critical point of
a linear dynamical system.
Two characteristic sets (1D & 2D) -
- if two of three real eigenvalues are equal or a pair of
complex numbers, one local characteristic structure is a
surface. Again, the type of the critical point can be an
attractor, repellor, or saddle.
Visualizing such a critical point, a stream surface is
integrated to represent the 2D characteristic element, and
two stream lines are integrated for the 1D characteristic
direction associated with the critical point.
Other types -
- Of course there are other, usually non-hyperbolic types of
critical points. Arbitrary complex local structures can
appear, especially if the Jacobian matrix degenerates and
higher-order derivatives are to be investigated for
analysis.
Specifying a general visualization technique for all these
types is cumbersome and usually not necessary, since usually
critical points are of one of
the simple types described above - non-hyperbolic systems
often are considered to be just a transitional element
between two hyperbolic systems with differing behavior.
For the visualization of system abstractions it is
useful to also include a certain amount of direct
visualization to give a few intuitive visual hints for
understanding the abstract structure. Streamlets, for example,
usually are easily understood and, thus, well suited for being
combined with the visualization of flow topology. See
Fig. 6.5 for three examples of such a
combination. Characteristic elements as well as few direct visual
hints, i.e., streamlets originating near the critical points, are
displayed.
Next: Visualizing characteristic structures
Up: Summary
Previous: Poincaré maps and visualization
Helwig Löffelmann, November 1998, mailto:helwig@cg.tuwien.ac.at.